How Did Kim Dotcom Make His Money

Is Kim Dotcom, the "pic manufacture killer", guilty of organized crime?

Ten years agone, you might take been looking for a solution to transport your favorite songs - heavy mp3 files - with your friends. Too heavy to send past email, you felt frustrated. You didn't want to wait to come across each of your friends in person to handle over a agglomeration of USB sticks. You remember yourself thinking that there must be an easiest way.

Fortunately, a quick search brought you straight to what seemed to be a simple solution: Megaupload. This revolutionary website allowed you to upload files for storage in the cloud. You tried and were provided with a unique link to your files. Exactly what you needed! You could share that link to others, enabling your friends to access the files.

Trouble solved. Y'all felt bang-up. But what you didn't know back then is that, by using Megaupload services, you had indirectly supported a criminal system growing its business organisation. How could you take known?

Past early 2012, Megaupload claimed to have over 60 million registered users. Information technology was said to be the thirteenth nearly often visited site on the Internet, alluring an average of 50 one thousand thousand visits daily and more than one billion visitors in full. At its peak, Megaupload was estimated to business relationship for approximately iv percent of all Internet traffic worldwide

On January 20th, 2012, over seventy special tactics officers armed with assault rifles breached a mansion in Coatesville, New Zealand, and arrested four internet businessmen for allegedly operating a global criminal organization. One of them was the leader of the CEO and founder of "Megaupload", apace nicknamed by the international press as the movie industry killer, and commonly known as Kim Dotcom.

In January 2012, Kim Dotcom and its partners were charged by a United States District Court with criminal copyright infringement and money laundering. They were accused of using public websites to facilitate the illegal reproduction and distribution of copyrighted movies, software, television programmes, and music, causing five hundred meg dollars in damages to copyright holders and collecting hundreds of millions in profit for themselves. Since then, the Us is seeking the extraction of Kim Dotcom to face a trial.

Multiple courts in New-Zealand have concluded that there are grounds for allowing the extradition, simply all routes of appeal have non, equally yet, been exhausted. The extradition example in New Zealand has at present reached the country's Supreme Court.

Of our interest is that the legal notion of "serious criminal offense" described in the Un Transnational Organized Crime Convention as a "criminal offence punishable by a maximum impecuniousness of freedom of at least four years or a more serious penalty". This was widely debated during the legal proceedings in order to determine if the offence of copyright infringement is an extradition offence under the United States/New Zealand Treaty.

How about you lot, dear reader? At present that you know more about Megaupload, practice you lot call back that the Kim Dotcom example qualifies every bit an organized criminal activity?